Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 7;8(3):e57596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057596

Table 1. Numerical results of SPM comparisons between 18F-FDG uptake in PET0 (n = 8) and PET1 (n = 8).

Comparison Cluster level Voxel level
Clusterextent Correctedp value Corticalregion Z score ofmaximum Talairachcoordinates Cortical region BA
PET0– PET1 727 0.000 R 3.26 18,1,−19 Uncus 34
R 3.19 24,6, −32 Superior Temporal Gyrus 38
R 2.97 30,18, −24 Inferior Frontal Gyrus 47
R 2.96 20, −13, −20 Parahippocampal Gyrus 28
364 0.000 R 2.85 10,7, −17 Subcallosal Gyrus 25
R 2.64 10,13, −19 Rectal Gyrus 11
PET1– PET0 8143 0.000 L 3.27 −4, −64,49 Precuneus 7
L 3.17 −46, −46,48 Inferior Parietal Lobule 40
R 3.11 2, −90,17 Cuneus 18
L 3.10 −2, −45,63 Paracentral Lobule 5
R 3.03 4, −42,57 Paracentral Lobule 5
L 3.03 −2, −97,3 Cuneus 18
R 3.03 22, −50,47 Precuneus 7
R 3.02 8, −92,27 Cuneus 19
L 2.97 0, −97,0 Cuneus 17

A value of p≤0.001, corrected for multiple comparison at cluster level, was accepted as statistically significant. In the ‘cluster level’ section on left, the number of voxels, the corrected p value of significance and the cortical region where the voxel is found, are all reported for each significant cluster. In the ‘voxel level’ section, all of the coordinates of the correlation sites (with the Z-score of the maximum correlation point), the corresponding cortical region and BA are reported for each significant cluster. L, left; R, right; BA, Brodmann’s area. In the case that the maximum correlation is achieved outside the grey matter, the nearest grey matter (within a range of 3×mm) is indicated with the corresponding BA.