Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 7;8(3):e57596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057596

Table 2. Numerical results of SPM comparisons between 18F-FDG uptake in CG (n = 30) and PET0 (n = 8).

Comparison Cluster level Voxel level
Clusterextent Correctedp value Corticalregion Z score ofmaximum Talairachcoordinates Cortical region BA
CG - PET0 22280 0.000 L 5.22 −22, −92, −16 Fusiform Gyrus 18
L 4.68 −22, −86,34 Cuneus 19
R 4.60 22, −94, −14 Fusiform Gyrus 18
R 4.60 16, −95, −4 Cuneus 17
R 4.58 28, −73,50 Precuneus 7
R 4.49 12, −86,37 Cuneus 19
L 4.20 −2, −65,53 Precuneus 7
L 3.89 −51, −27,51 Postcentral Gyrus 2
PET0 - CG 1032 0.03 R 3.88 38,7, −21 Superior Temporal Gyrus 38
L 3.29 −40,1, −12 Posterior Insula 13

A value of p≤0.05, corrected for multiple comparison at cluster level, was accepted as statistically significant. In the ‘cluster level’ section on left, the number of voxels, the corrected p value of significance and the cortical region where the voxel is found, are all reported for each significant cluster. In the ‘voxel level’ section, all of the coordinates of the correlation sites (with the Z-score of the maximum correlation point), the corresponding cortical region and BA are reported for each significant cluster. L, left; R, right; BA, Brodmann’s area. In the case that the maximum correlation is achieved outside the grey matter, the nearest grey matter (within a range of 3 mm) is indicated with the corresponding BA.