Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 23;288(10):7077–7085. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.401190

TABLE 1.

Fxyd2−/− mouse colony breeding history

Each generation (i.e. each row) comprises all of the pairs or harems bred in a backcross or intercross generation. The breeding success data are broken down into three categories: how many visible pregnancies were observed per month, how many of the litters that were born had any surviving pups, and of successful litters, what percentage of pups survived to weaning. The numbers for the mutant mice represent the most optimistic values, because the % survival of pups did not take into account any pups that died and were eaten before they were detected and counted.

Breeding partners, genotype Pregnancies/month. The average for each generation is listed separately. n = number of pregnancies % Successful litters where any pups survived % Survival of pups, in litters where any pups survived
Back-cross, 1.0 (n = 2) 50 87
Fxyd2−/− sire, and 1.0 (n = 7) 100 87
WT dam 0.84 (n = 8) 100 89
Back-cross, 1.0 (n = 12) 100 85
Fxyd2+/− sire, and WT dam 1.3 (n = 6) 83 85
Back-cross, 0.4 (n = 4) 100 100
WT sire, and 0.5 (n = 12) 42 74
Fxyd2−/− dam
Fxyd2+/− sire 0.43 (n = 37) 65 82
Fxyd2+/− dam 0.57 (n = 33) 66 70
0.3 (n = 16) 75 82
0.4 (n = 12) 75 100
0.56 (n = 13) 77 98
0.92 (n = 23) 96 82
0.64 (n = 12) 75 64
Fxyd2−/− sire 0.54 (n = 4) 50a 50a
Fxyd2−/− dam 0.83 (n = 3) 33 6
0.46 (n = 2) 50 50
0.87 (n = 3) 66a 54a

a Some newborn pups were fostered with WT dams (synchronized pregnancies).