Table 2.

Pearson correlation coefficients (r values) between integrated EMG amplitude (stance and swing) and net metabolic power

Participant number	Fast leg				Slow leg
	TA	LG	BF	VL	TA	LG	BF	VL
P1	0.43	0.50	0.35	0.39	n.s.	0.33	0.36	0.35
P2	0.45	0.31	n.s.	0.52	0.51	0.25	0.45	0.43
P3	0.54	0.56	0.35	0.43	0.48	0.38	0.28	0.42
P4	0.50	0.47	0.38	0.37	0.45	0.48	0.46	n.s.
P5	0.56	0.54	0.39	0.25	0.49	0.30	n.s.	n.s.
P6	n.s.	0.36	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	−0.26	n.s.	−0.25
P7	0.52	0.47	−0.32	0.45	0.52	0.35	n.s.	n.s.
P8	0.45	0.45	0.50	n.s.	0.48	n.s.	n.s.	0.33
P9	0.56	0.42	n.s.	0.42	0.48	n.s.	0.29	0.48
P10	n.s.	0.41	n.s.	−0.31	0.45	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.
P11	0.54	0.49	0.57	0.55	0.43	0.53	n.s.	0.46
Mean ± SEM	0.50 ± 0.02	0.45 ± 0.02	0.32 ± 0.11	0.34 ± 0.09	0.48 ± 0.01	0.53 ± 0.09	0.37 ± 0.04	0.32 ± 0.10
n	(n = 9)	(n = 11)	(n = 6)	(n = 9)	(n = 9)	(n = 8)	(n = 5)	(n = 7)

Abbreviations: BF, biceps femoris; LG, lateral gastrocnemius; TA, tibialis anterior; and VL, vastus lateralis. Muscles that were not correlated with net metabolic power are denoted as non-significant (n.s.). The average correlation coefficient, standard error and the number of participants with significant correlations are presented in the last two rows of the table.