Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 10;591(Pt 4):1145–1166. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.241018

Table 1.

Comparison of membrane properties and network activity in R6/2 WT and CAR mice

WT CAR


Property Mean ±SEM n Mean ±SEM n p value Test
Membrane potential (mV) −69.5 0.58 108 −60.5 0.96 101 <0.0001 Mann-Whitney’s U test
Whole-cell input resistance (MΩ)
 Intracellular standard 59.2 2.50 107 128.2 8.44 99 <0.0001 Mann-Whitney’s U test
 Intracellular with GDPβS 38.1 3.10 13 72.70 4.80 37 <0.0010 Student's unpaired t test
Whole-cell capacitance (pF) 79.7 1.91 107 66.1 1.63 99 <0.0001 Student's unpaired t test
Reobasic current (pA) 189.6 11.66 71 97.3 6.14 66 <0.0001 Mann-Whitney’s U test

All measurements at a holding voltage Vh=−70 mV and chloride reversal potential ECl=−21 mV. The age of the R6/2 cohort was 78.0 ± 1.1 days, n= 91 vs. CAR 75.0 ± 1.2 days, n= 77 (n.s.). Abbreviations: n, number of neurons; p value, significance level; for all other abbreviations see list on Introduction page.