Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;5(1):1–10. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.147

Table 4:Relevance and Education.

Overall N (%) Medical Students N (%) Surgical Residents N (%) P Value*
Relevance of identifying IPV victims in practice Not at all relevant 2 (1.0%) 1 (0.8%) 1 (1.5%) NA
Possibly relevant 15 (7.8%) 11 (8.9%) 4 (5.9%)
Somewhat relevant 27 (14.0%) 18 (14.5%) 9 (13.2%)
Very relevant 144 (75.0%) 94 (75.8%) 50 (73.5%)
Depends on Specialty 4 (2.1%) ----*** 4 (5.9%)
Level of comfort asking a woman about abuse Very uncomfortable 4 (2.1%) 1 (0.8%) 3 (4.3%) 0.023**
Uncomfortable 31 (16.1%) 24 (19.4%) 7 (10.1%)
Somewhat comfortable 91 (47.2%) 64 (51.6%) 27(39.1%)
Comfortable 57 (29.5%) 29 (23.4%) 28 (40.6%)
Very comfortable 10 (5.2%) 6 (4.8%) 4 (5.8%)
Is health care provider reporting of intimate partner violence mandatory in Canada? Yes 23 (12.1%) 16 (12.9%) 7 (10.6%) 0.877
No 129 (67.9%) 84 (67.7%) 45 (68.2%)
Unsure 38 (20.0%) 24 (19.4%) 14 (21.2%)
Amount of IPV education/training received None 83 (43.0%) 66 (53.2%) 17 (24.6%) <0.001**
Some 108 (56.0%) 56 (45.2%) 52 (75.4%)
Extensive 2 (1.0%) 2 (1.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Adequate amount of IPV training received thus far Yes 21 (10.9%) 8 (6.5%) 13 (19.1%) 0.001
No 145 (75.5%) 104 (83.9%) 41 (60.3%)
Unsure 26 (13.5%) 12 (9.7%) 14 (20.6%)
Desire for additional training on the assessment and treatment of IPV Yes 149 (77.2%) 109 (87.9%) 40 (58.0%) <0.001**
No 16 (8.3%) 4 (3.2%) 12 (17.4%)
Unsure 22 (11.4%) 7 (5.6%) 15 (21.7%)
Not relevant to my intended practice 6 (3.1%) 4 (3.2%) 2 (2.9%)
Providing medical students with more education/training on intimate partner violence would help increase the number of physicians that screen for it Strongly agree 47 (24.4%) 110 28 (22.6%) 19 (27.5%) 0.032**
Agree (57.0%) 79 (63.7%) 31 (44.9%)
Unsure 26 (13.5%) 11 (8.9%) 15 (21.7%)
Disagree 10 (5.2%) 6 (4.8%) 4 (5.8%)
Strongly Disagree 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)

* Chi-Squared test

** Has an expected value of less than 5

Totals may not add to 200 participants due to missing data.