Table 3.
Distribution of molecular markers used in this study in different sites within the RGA watershed
| Site | % of tested water samples positive for marker (no. of samples tested) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ccoc | Uni8F | Bac32F | HF183 | CF128 | PF163 | CBR2-42 | CP2-9 | CP3-49 | |
| 1 | 78 (54) | 100 (54) | 94 (54) | 6 (54) | 6 (54) | 0 (33) | 6 (54) | 3 (39) | 0 (39) |
| 2 | 82 (54) | 100 (54) | 94 (54) | 6 (54) | 4 (54) | 0 (33) | 2 (54) | 0 (39) | 3 (39) |
| 3 | 81 (53) | 100 (53) | 93 (53) | 17 (53) | 8 (53) | 3 (32) | 2 (53) | 0 (38) | 0 (38) |
| 4 | 82 (54) | 100 (54) | 96 (54) | 54 (54) | 2 (54) | 24 (33) | 6 (54) | 0 (39) | 0 (39) |
| 5 | 65 (54) | 100 (54) | 94 (54) | 13 (54) | 6 (54) | 6 (33) | 2 (54) | 0 (39) | 0 (39) |
| 6 | 78 (54) | 100 (54) | 96 (54) | 7 (54) | 6 (54) | 6 (33) | 0 (54) | 0 (39) | 0 (39) |
| 7 | 87 (52) | 100 (52) | 96 (52) | 46 (52) | 25 (52) | 23 (31) | 2 (52) | 3 (37) | 0 (37) |
| 8 | 78 (54) | 100 (54) | 96 (54) | 19 (54) | 17 (54) | 12 (33) | 2 (54) | 0 (39) | 3 (39) |
| 9 | 88 (51) | 100 (51) | 92 (51) | 12 (51) | 14 (51) | 3 (31) | 0 (51) | 0 (37) | 0 (37) |
| 10 | 74 (54) | 100 (54) | 94 (54) | 46 (54) | 2 (54) | 12 (34) | 0 (54) | 3 (40) | 0 (40) |