Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar;79(5):1473–1480. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02970-12

Table 4.

Coefficients of determination (r2) and probabilities (P) for relationships of proportions of conidia to proportions of mycelia produced by A. flavus isolates during cocultivation for all nutrient treatments to which an isolate pair was subjected and for all isolate pairs cultivated on each nutrient treatment

Category r2 P value
Isolate paira
    CG136/YV04 0.007 0.87
    CG136/MR17 0.37 0.20
    YV04/MR17 0.08 0.59
    WM01/MR17 0.49 0.12
    EB01/DV901 0.02 0.79
    RB04/MN902 0.65 0.05
Nutrient treatmentb
    0.1× nitrate 0.77 0.02
    0.1× sucrose 0.58 0.08
    0.1× Czapek's 0.65 0.05
    1× Czapek's 0.32 0.24
    0.1× asparagine 0.47 0.13
    1× asparagine 0.61 0.07
a

For each pair of cocultivated isolates, the percentages of conidia and mycelia produced by each isolate were quantified on six agar media, each representing a different nutrient treatment; the coefficients of determination reflect the relationships of mycelial values to conidial values (n = 6) for each isolate pair.

b

The coefficients of determination reflect the relationships of mycelial values to conidial values (n = 6) in each nutrient treatment. The asparagine treatments contained asparagine as the sole source of both carbon and nitrogen (0.1×, 15 mM asparagine; 1×, 150 mM asparagine). For Czapek's treatments, sucrose and nitrate were the carbon and nitrogen source, respectively (0.1× nitrate, 88 mM sucrose and 3.5 mM nitrate; 0.1× sucrose, 8.8 mM sucrose and 35 mM nitrate; 0.1× Czapek's agar, 8.8 mM sucrose and 3.5 mM nitrate; 1× Czapek's agar, 88 mM sucrose and 35 mM nitrate).