Table 4.
Category | r2 | P value |
---|---|---|
Isolate paira | ||
CG136/YV04 | 0.007 | 0.87 |
CG136/MR17 | 0.37 | 0.20 |
YV04/MR17 | 0.08 | 0.59 |
WM01/MR17 | 0.49 | 0.12 |
EB01/DV901 | 0.02 | 0.79 |
RB04/MN902 | 0.65 | 0.05 |
Nutrient treatmentb | ||
0.1× nitrate | 0.77 | 0.02 |
0.1× sucrose | 0.58 | 0.08 |
0.1× Czapek's | 0.65 | 0.05 |
1× Czapek's | 0.32 | 0.24 |
0.1× asparagine | 0.47 | 0.13 |
1× asparagine | 0.61 | 0.07 |
For each pair of cocultivated isolates, the percentages of conidia and mycelia produced by each isolate were quantified on six agar media, each representing a different nutrient treatment; the coefficients of determination reflect the relationships of mycelial values to conidial values (n = 6) for each isolate pair.
The coefficients of determination reflect the relationships of mycelial values to conidial values (n = 6) in each nutrient treatment. The asparagine treatments contained asparagine as the sole source of both carbon and nitrogen (0.1×, 15 mM asparagine; 1×, 150 mM asparagine). For Czapek's treatments, sucrose and nitrate were the carbon and nitrogen source, respectively (0.1× nitrate, 88 mM sucrose and 3.5 mM nitrate; 0.1× sucrose, 8.8 mM sucrose and 35 mM nitrate; 0.1× Czapek's agar, 8.8 mM sucrose and 3.5 mM nitrate; 1× Czapek's agar, 88 mM sucrose and 35 mM nitrate).