Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 13;13(Suppl 1):S6–S17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0760-y

Table 5.

Blood loss data from studies on pooled neuromuscular disorders (anterior and posterior approaches). A anterior approach, P posterior approach, AP anterior and posterior approach, CDI Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation

Study [reference] (date of publication) / (date(s) of surgery) Estimated blood loss (EBL) (ml) [mean (range)] Number of procedures Technique Estimated blood loss / individual vertebral level in fusion (ml) (EBL/# levels=) Estimated blood loss / total blood volume Comments
Floman et al. [24] (1982)/(1972–1977) A 1033 73 Multiple techniques. Posterior procedure performed 2 weeks after anterior procedure - - EBL in Dwyer procedures 1250
P 2200 - - -
Neustadt et al. [51] (1992)/(1985–1988) P 1945 (450–4500) 18 Posterior fusion to pelvis with CDI - - -
Benson et al. [7] (1998)/(1990–1994) P 1684 (450–4000) P 38 Luque-Galveston and 39/50 Anterior discectomy - - 43 with allograft only; hypotensive anesthesia and autologous blood retrieval
AP 2329 (550–6000) AP 12 and fusion without instrumentation - -
Boachie-Adjei et al. [12] (1989)/(1979–1984) A 1100 (300–2225) AP 11 Luque-Galveston. Anterior fusion without instrumentation; local bone graft with allograft A 100/7.4=149 - -
P 2639 (270–8000) P 35 P 2639/15=176 -
Ferguson et al. [22] (1996)/(1977–1991) 1. A 896 1. 29 1. Two stages (anterior discectomy and fusion) rib with no instrumentation. Posterior Luque-Galveston 1. A 896/8=112 1. A 28% -
    P 3360 -     P 3360/15= 224     P 100.9%
2. AP 2058 2. 16 2. Both procedures same day 2. 2058/14.9= 138 2. 83%
Bell et al. [5] (1989)/(1983–1986) P 3500 (800–11000) 34 Unit rod system T2-pelvis. Local bone graft only - - -