[Table/Fig-4]:
[Table/Fig-4]: Sensitivity pattern of Carbapenem Resistant (CR) Enterobacteriaceae against the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations Abbreviations: Amoxy/clav-Amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, Amp/sul-Ampicillin-sulbactam, Cefo/sul-Cefoperazone-sulbactam, Pip/taz-Piperacillin- tazobactam, Cfp/taz-Cefepime-Tazobactam , Ticar/clav-Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid,CR-carbapenem resistant, ND - Not done.
| S. No. | Organism | Total isolates | No. of C R isolates | %CR | Amoxy/clav | Amp/Sul | Cefo/sul | Pip/taz | Cfp/taz | Ticar/clav |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. S(%S) | No. S (%S) | No. S (%S) | No. S (%S) | No. S (%S) | No. S (%S) | |||||
| 1 | Escherichia coli | 185 | 11 | 12.94 | 0(0%) | 1(9.09%) | 7(63.63%) | 1(9.09%) | 7(63.63%) | 1 9.09%) |
| 2 | Klebseilla pneumoniae | 64 | 20 | 31.25 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 7(35%) | 1(5%) | 11(13.75%) | 0(0%) |
| 3 | Klebseilla ornitholytica | 5 | 1 | 20 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(100%) | 0(0%) |
| 4 | Klebseilla oxytoca | 1 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 5 | Kluvyera ascorbata | 2 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 6 | Enterobacter cloacae | 6 | 1 | 16.66 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(100%) | 1(100%) | 1(100%) | 1(100%) |
| 7 | Enterobacter agglomerans | 2 | 2 | 100 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(50%) | 0(0%) | 1(50%) | 0(0%) |
| 8 | Citrobacter freundii | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1(100%) | 0(0%) | 1(100%) | 0(0%) |
| 9 | Morganella morganii | 3 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 10 | Proteus mirabilis | 4 | 4 | 100 | 1(25%) | 1(25%) | 3(75%) | 1(25%) | 3(75%) | 1(25%) |
| 11 | Proteus vulgaris | 1 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 12 | Providentia stuartii | 3 | 1 | 33.33 | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) |
| Total | 278 | 41 | 14.75% | 1(2.43%) | 2(4.87%) | 20(48.78%) | 4(9.75%) | 25(60.97%) | 3(7.31%) |