Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 10;41(1):63–75. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1029

Table 1.

Parameter values used to simulate the restrained bead-chain polymer model of chromatin and to provide a physically realistic approximation of the mechanical properties of chromatin, as currently known from experiments

Parameter Symbol Reduced units SI units
Thermal energya Inline graphic 1.0 Inline graphic
Bead massb m 1.0 Inline graphic
Lennard–Jones size parameter Inline graphic 1.0 30 nm
Lennard–Jones energy parameter Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Bead separation Inline graphic Inline graphic 30 nm
Contact distancec Inline graphic Inline graphic 45 nm
Bond spring constantd Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Persistence lengthe Inline graphic Inline graphic 120 nm
Bending energy constant Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Time step/damping constantf Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic

aEnergy per bead per degree of freedom at T = 300 K.

bRepresentative value based on the experimental measurement of 23.3 MDa for a 15.5-kb fragment of 30-nm chromatin upstream of the chicken Inline graphic-globin locus (42).

cFollowing Rosa et al. (35), equivalent to assuming that contacts between chromatin fibers are mediated by proteins of 15-nm diameter.

dFrom experiments, the stretching modulus is Inline graphic 5–150 pN (43), hence Inline graphic ranges from Inline graphic to Inline graphic.

eFrom experiments, Inline graphic 30 – 200 nm (43).

fTo maximize conformation sampling efficiency, we used the largest value of Inline graphic found to maintain stability of the BD simulations. A lower bound for Inline graphic can be estimated by considering a chromatin sphere of radius r = 15 nm and using Inline graphic with the viscosity of water Inline graphic = 890 µPa s at 25°C and 1 bar (44). Then, Inline graphic 18 ns.