Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 24;41(1):e21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks878

Table 7.

Comparison of our method to other method on ‘Common test’ testing data set of mirExplorer

Method Balance method CV SE SP Gm ACC(%) Multiloop
Triplet-SVM (SVM) 88.40 83.50 0.859 N/A
MiPred (random forest) 84.34 93.56 0.888 N/A
microPred (SVM) SMOTE outer 5cv 90.50 66.43 0.775 54.23
mirExplorer (AdaBoost) SMOTE + undersampling outer 10cv 94.32 97.11 0.957 92.68
Our method (ensemble) Modified-SMOTEBagging 10x5cv 95.11 97.91 0.965 97.25

SE, SP and ACC represent sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, respectively.