Table 2. Comparative effectiveness between percutaneous minimally invasive and open surgery for thoracolumbar fracture.
Outcome | Minimally invasive | Open | P |
---|---|---|---|
Radiographic | Mean change | Mean change | |
Sagittal Cobb angle, ° | |||
– Wang et al5 | 10.3 ± 6.1 | 9.3 ± 7.3 | .651 |
Fractured vertebral body angle, ° | |||
– Wang et al5 | 6.6 ± 4.0 | 7.9 ± 4.9 | .396 |
– Wild et al4 | 7.7 | 12.2 | |
Anterior vertebral body height, % | |||
– Wang et al5 | 21.0 ± 11.8 | 28.6 ± 18.7 | .155 |
Posterior vertebral body height, % | |||
– Wang et al5 | 4.4 ± 3.2 | 6.2 ± 4.8 | .196 |
Bisegmental wedge angle, ° | |||
– Wild et al4 | 2.6 | 2.4 | |
Clinical | |||
VAS (incisional pain) | |||
– Wang et al5 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 2.2 ± 0.8 | < .05 |
MacNab criteria | |||
– Wang et al5 | 88.2 | 85.7 | |
Hannover spine score | |||
– Wild et al4 | 84.8 | 78 | |
SF-36 | |||
– Wild et al4 | 59.1 | 50 | .069 |