Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Cardiolog. 2012 Jun 15;8(10):1–11. doi: 10.4172/2155-9880.S8-010

Table 6.

Resynchronization therapy in patients with RHF.

Study Study population Characteristics N Design Main findings *
Janousek et al.
2001 [84]
Congenital Heart
disease
Children with acute post-operative
HF with conduction delay
20 Prospective study Beneficial effects. Improvement in hemodynamics
(systolic blood pressure)
Dubin et al. 2003
[85]
Congenital Heart
disease
Chronic RV dysfunction
RBBB
TOF, aortic stenosis after Ross
procedure
7 Prospective
Multipacing sites,
conductance catheter
Beneficial effect. Atrioventricular augments RV and
systemic performance (↑CI by 17±8%,↑ in RV dP/dt )
Janousek et al.
2004 [86]
Congenital Heart
Disease
D-TGA (atrial baffle) L-TGA 8 Prospective Beneficial effect. ↑ RVEF by 9.6%, ↓ RVMPI by
7.7%.
Dubin et al. 2005
[87]
Congenital Heart
Disease and Pediatric
CHD and dilated CMP and
congenital AV block
103 Multicenter Study (22
centers)
Beneficial effects in all 3 groups. Average ↑ in EF
11.9% to 16.1%. Responders had lower baseline EF.
*

Unless otherwise specified, the results refer to statistically significant findings (p<0.05). The changes reported refer to relative changes in mean effect size or when indicated by ‡ changes in absolute effect size. Abbreviations as in previous tables. EF indicates ejection fraction, RVMPI indicates RV myocardial performance index