Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep;195(4):812–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04221.x

Table 3.

Habitat-specific mean Fv/Fm values before and after the start of the drying experiment for specimens selected for darkness and light treatment (200 μmol m−2 s−1)

Fv/FmBefore start of experiment Fv/FmAfter drying and 48 h recovery Fv/FmPercentage of start values



Darkness Light Darkness Light Darkness Light
Lobaria pulmonaria
 Xeric open 0.684 ± 0.010a 0.680 ± 0.015a 0.724 ± 0.007a 0.528 ± 0.056a 106.2 ± 1.2b 77.5 ± 8.1b
 Mesic open 0.702 ± 0.011a 0.700 ± 0.012a 0.725 ± 0.004a 0.533 ± 0.054a 103.7 ± 1.5b 77.2 ± 8.0b
 Mesic closed 0.736 ± 0.002b 0.733 ± 0.003b 0.733 ± 0.003a 0.431 ± 0.045a 99.6 ± 0.3a 58.8 ± 6.1a
Platismatia glauca
 Xeric open 0.691 ± 0.013b 0.686 ± 0.019a 0.721 ± 0.012b 0.538 ± 0.040b 104.5 ± 1.1a 79.3 ± 5.6b
 Mesic closed 0.612 ± 0.020a 0.651 ± 0.017a 0.655 ± 0.018a 0.270 ± 0.053a 108.0 ± 2.6a 40.3 ± 7.7a
Lobaria hallii
 Xeric open 0.524 ± 0.007ab 0.520 ± 0.009a 0.488 ± 0.010a 0.438 ± 0.011a 93.2 ± 1.4a 84.2 ± 1.1a
 Mesic open 0.510 ± 0.006a 0.491 ± 0.009a 0.474 ± 0.008a 0.422 ± 0.008a 92.9 ± 1.0a 86.2 ± 1.8a
 Mesic closed 0.543 ± 0.008b 0.546 ± 0.009b 0.503 ± 0.010a 0.457 ± 0.014a 93.0 ± 1.0a 83.6 ± 1.7a
Lobaria retigera
 Mesic closed 0.518 ± 0.006 0.520 ± 0.005 0.494 ± 0.007 0.429 ± 0.010 95.4 ± 1.3 82.5 ± 2.0
Lobaria scrobiculata
 Xeric open 0.521 ± 0.012a 0.530 ± 0.010a 0.547 ± 0.007a 0.521 ± 0.013a 105.7 ± 1.9b 98.7 ± 2.6a
 Mesic open 0.542 ± 0.007a 0.551 ± 0.006a 0.549 ± 0.008a 0.506 ± 0.014a 101.4 ± 1.2ab 91.8 ± 2.2a
 Mesic closed 0.548 ± 0.007a 0.527 ± 0.010a 0.548 ± 0.007a 0.492 ± 0.014a 100.0 ± 0.7a 93.6 ± 2.4a
Pseudocyphellaria anomala
 Xeric open 0.594 ± 0.007a 0.586 ± 0.013a 0.580 ± 0.005a 0.538 ± 0.021a 97.8 ± 0.9a 91.0 ± 2.5a
 Mesic closed 0.581 ± 0.005a 0.577 ± 0.004a 0.572 ± 0.006a 0.500 ± 0.014a 98.5 ± 0.9a 86.7 ± 2.4a

Values are mean ± 1SE; n = 19–20.

Means combined measurements from all four relative humidity levels during the 7-d experiment. Within each species sampled at more than one site, an ANOVA was run to test whether the sampled sites differed significantly from each other (P < 0.05). Within each species, sites sharing the same letter for a given variable were not statistically different from each other (all pairwise multiple comparison procedures: Holm–Sidak method).