Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 24;15(4):372–382. doi: 10.1111/dom.12054

Table 3.

Summary of changes in indices of β-cell function from baseline to week 26 (main study)*

PBO CANA 100 mg CANA 300 mg
HOMA2-%B, n 116 133 130
 Mean (s.d.) baseline 59.1 (29.7) 50.2 (31.5) 53.5 (29.9)
 LS mean (s.e.) change −2.5 (2.1) 9.9 (2.0) 20.3 (2.0)
 Difference versus PBO (95% CI) 12.4 (6.6, 18.1) 22.8 (17.0, 28.6)
Proinsulin/insulin ratio, n 92 107 92
 Mean (s.d.) baseline (pmol/mIU) 3.8 (2.3) 3.8 (1.6) 4.5 (4.1)
 LS mean (s.e.) change 0.5 (0.2) 0.0 (0.2) −0.3 (0.2)
 Difference versus PBO (95% CI) −0.5 (−1.1, 0.2) −0.8 (−1.4, –0.1)
Proinsulin/C-peptide ratio, n 111 120 106
 Mean (s.d.) baseline (nmol/nmol) 0.04 (0.02) 0.05 (0.02) 0.05 (0.02)
 LS mean (s.e.) change 0.007 (0.00) −0.003 (0.00) −0.003 (0.00)
 Difference versus PBO (95% CI) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00)
AUCC/AUCG ratio, n 35 52 48
 Mean (s.d.) baseline (pmol/mmol) 200.6 (97.6) 160.6 (92.7) 165.3 (66.5)
 LS mean (s.e.) change −18.8 (26.7) 22.2 (25.4) 31.9 (26.3)
 Difference versus PBO (95% CI) 41.0 (19.0, 63.0) 50.7 (28.5, 72.9)

AUCC, C-peptide area under the curve; AUCG, glucose area under the curve; CANA, canagliflozin; CI, confidence interval; FS-MMTT, frequently-sampled mixed-meal tolerance test; HOMA, Homeostasis Model Assessment; LS, least squares; PBO, placebo; s.d., standard deviation; s.e., standard error.

*

Statistical comparison for CANA 100 and 300 mg versus PBO not performed (not pre-specified).

Assessed only for subjects who participated in the FS-MMTT.