Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Compr Physiol. 2012 Jan 1;2(1):295–319. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100070

Table 2.

Boundary Conditions, Relative Effects of Resistance and Compliance on Pressure and Flow and Pros/Cons for Isolated Supported Ventricular Models: Pressure-Controlled (PCISV), End Systolic/Diastolic Volume-Controlled (VCISV), and Windkessel-Controlled (WCISV)

Effect on pulse pressure
and flow

Boundary condition Figure Resistance Compliance Pros Cons
PCISV Constant left artial pressure with distal mechanical analog Figure 10 Low moderate High Mechanical analog of vasculature allows for direct control of hydraulic resistance and compliance No direct control of end-systolic or end-diastolic conditions
VCISV End-systolic/end-diastolic ventricular volume Figure 11 High Low Direct control of end-systolic and end-diastolic conditions No functioning atria, ventricular valves or distal hydraulic boundary conditions, assumes constant contractility
WCISV Windkessel electrical analog (ventricular flows based on pressure input) Figure 12 High Low Direct control of end-systolic and end-diastolic conditions with modeled hydraulic boundary condition Distal hydraulic boundary conditions dependent on Windkessel function may not be physiologically accurate