Table 1.
Characteristic | Physical Activity Group (n = 213) | Successful Aging Group (n = 211) | p Value* |
---|---|---|---|
Age, M ± SD | 76.5±4.2 | 77.0±4.3 | .24 |
Race/ethnicity, n (%) | .87 | ||
African American/black | 37 (17.4) | 40 (19.0) | |
Caucasian/white | 160 (75.1) | 155 (73.5) | |
Latino, Hispanic/Spanish | 10 (4.7) | 10 (4.7) | |
Other/mixed | 6 (2.8) | 5 (2.4) | |
Refused/missing | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | |
Sex, n (%) | .89 | ||
Female | 146 (68.5) | 146 (69.2) | |
Male | 67 (31.5) | 65 (30.8) | |
Smoking status, n (%) | .87 | ||
Never | 174 (81.7) | 176 (83.4) | |
Former | 32 (15.0) | 28 (13.3) | |
Current | 7 (3.3) | 7 (3.3) | |
Education, n (%) | .86 | ||
<High school | 5 (2.3) | 6 (2.8) | |
High school | 58 (27.2) | 58 (27.5) | |
>High School | 142 (66.7) | 142 (67.3) | |
Other/refused | 8 (3.8) | 5 (2.4) | |
Marital status, n (%) | .65 | ||
Married | 78 (36.6) | 89 (42.2) | |
Divorced/separated | 37 (17.4) | 28 (13.3) | |
Widowed | 86 (40.4) | 87 (41.2) | |
Other | 12 (5.6) | 7 (3.3) | |
Self-reported health, n (%) | .48 | ||
Excellent | 10 (4.7) | 7 (3.3) | |
Very good | 48 (22.5) | 63 (29.9) | |
Good | 115 (54.0) | 105 (49.8) | |
Fair | 35 (16.4) | 30 (14.2) | |
Poor | 4 (1.9) | 3 (1.4) | |
Do not know/refused | 1 (0.5) | 3 (1.4) | |
Body mass index, m/kg2, M ± SD | 30.8±6.9 | 29.9±6.1 | .15 |
Abdominal circumference, cm, M ± SD | 100.8±21.4 | 98.8±20.5 | .33 |
Functional measures | |||
Any activity of daily living difficulty, n (%) | 172 (80.8) | 175 (82.9) | .56 |
Difficulty walking one quarter of a mile, n (%) | 13 (6.1) | 15 (7.1) | .68 |
Difficulty walking 1 mile, n (%) | 82 (38.5) | 100 (47.4) | .06 |
SPPB score, M ± SD | 7.6±1.5 | 7.5±1.4 | .43 |
Balance, M ± SD | |||
Gait speed, M ± SD | |||
Chair stand, M ± SD | |||
Grip strength in dominant hand, kg, M ± SD | 26.7±9.5 | 24.0±8.1 | .46 |
400-m Walk time (s) M ± SD | 492±114 | 492±114 | .75 |
Notes: LIFE-P = lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot study; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; SPPB = short physical performance battery.
*Continuous variables were analyzed using independent t tests; categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square.
Adapted from Katula JA, Kritchevsky SB, Guralnik JM, et al. (20).