Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov 19;70(4):1026–1037. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24540

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Voxel-wise T2 map obtained by CURLIE and SEPG fitting (T1=950 ms) from the data acquired with the FAs of the refocusing pulses prescribed to 180°. (b–d) The %difference between T2 maps obtained from data acquired with prescribed FAs of 180° and 120° using REPCOM (which ignores indirect echoes) and CURLIE with SEPG fitting. Each difference map was obtained from the T2 maps obtained by the same fitting algorithm for the prescribed FAs of 180° and 120°. The difference maps support the concept that the CURLIE reconstruction followed by SEPG fitting significantly reduces the effect of indirect echoes in T2 estimation.