Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Nov 11;38(7):1021–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.10.008

Table 1.

Intended and unintended damage after neurotoxic lesions of the amygdala

Intended Damage
Unintended Damage
Amygdala
Hippocampus
Perirhinal
Subjects Lf% Rt% X% W% Lf% Rt% X% W% Lf% Rt% X% W°/o
Neo-Aibo-1 89.0 59.8 74.4 53.2 5.1 3.1 4.1 0.2 2.0 10.1 6.0 0.2
Neo-Aibo-2 42.0 77.6 59.8 32.6 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neo-Aibo-3 33.0 61.1 47.1 20.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neo-Aibo-4 62.1 90.0 76.0 55.9 1.9 3.0 2.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neo-Aibo-5 41.2 66.6 53.9 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neo-Aibo-6 52.1 71.6 63.8 39.3 5.6 10.3 8.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mean 71.8 53.2 62.5 38.1 2.9 2.1 2.5 0.1 1.7 0.3 1.0 0.03

Rt%: percent damage in the right hemisphere; Lf%: percent damage in the left hemisphere; X%: average damage to both hemispheres; W%: weighted average damage to both hemispheres (W%=(Lf%×Rt%)/100). Neo-A-F: female amygdala lesion subject, Neo-A-M: male amygdala lesion subject.