Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2013 Apr;29(4):317–323. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579b87

Table 2.

Social support, coping, depressive symptoms, and personality measures in samples of high utilizers and comparison patients

n
Comparison High Utilizers ES p Co HU
Social Support

Extent 19.6 (13.4) 17.1 (10.5) 0.208 0.488 24 23
Satisfaction 11.3 (7.21) 12.7 (7.80) 0.190 0.525 24 23
Coping Strategies

Distraction 15.3 (7.85) 13.1 (6.36) 0.316 0.295 24 23
Catastrophizing 13.6 (7.97) 13.8 (7.58) 0.026 0.930 24 23
Ignoring 12.5 (7.06) 11.8 (5.94) 0.106 0.724 24 23
Distancing 6.83 (6.71) 4.70 (4.85) 0.374 0.216 24 23
Coping Self-Statements 15.6 (6.34) 15.3 (3.74) 0.055 0.855 24 23
Praying 14.5 (4.22) 14.3 (3.77) 0.050 0.867 24 23
Depressive Symptoms

Beck Depression Inventory 10.8 (9.39) 14.8 (12.6) 0.368 0.222 24 23
Personality

Neuroticism 50.2 (10.4) 51.9 (12.0) 0.158 0.602 23 23
Extraversion 47.1 (13.2) 42.0 (7.81) 0.483 0.120 23 23
Openness 50.5 (9.11) 47.6 (8.98) 0.333 0.274 23 23
Agreeableness 45.7 (12.9) 46.7 (11.1) 0.078 0.798 23 23
Conscientiousness 50.5 (10.2) 47.4 (9.87) 0.314 0.302 23 23

Values are summarized as mean (standard deviation). The measures of effect size is Cohen's d. The far right columns represent the number in each group for each comparison; “Co” represents the comparison group and “HU” the high utilizers.