Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin J Pain. 2013 Apr;29(4):334–340. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318267252d

Table 4.

A comparison of surface EMG and flexion ROM measures between chronic low back pain and pain-free control subjects

Measure CLBP Subjects
(N= 218)
Control Subjects
(N= 30)
significance
Flexion-Relaxation Ratios
EXT/MVF (mean, SD) Range 38.7 (28.7) 1.6–91.9 3.9 (2.4) 1.3–13.2 <0.001
FLEX/MVF (mean, SD) Range 5.2 (6.8) 0.9–40.6 15.1 (7.7) 5.1–38.5 <0.001
FLEX/EXT (mean, SD) Range 0.70 (0.20) 0.3–1.4 0.47 (0.15) 0.2–0.9 <0.001
STAND/MVF (mean, SD) Range 1.5 (2.3) 0.1–15.3 2.6 (1.6) 0.9–6.0 0.007
Absolute SEMG (µV)
MVF SEMG (mean, SD) Range 12.2 (9.7) 0.8–44.6 2.0 (0.6) 0.8–3.4 <0.001
FR achieved (µV ≤3.5)* (n, %) 29% (n = 63) 100% (n = 30) <0.001
Pre-flexion (mean, SD) Range 7.0 (4.6) 1.2–26.0 4.9 (3.3) 1.8–16.8 0.014
Post-flexion/Recovery (mean, SD) Range 9.4 (5.7) 1.4–28.9 6.6 (4.8) 1.4–21.4 0.011
Flexion Range of Motion (degrees)
Gross ROM (mean, SD) Range 71.7 (24.2) 10–143 110 (11.7) 77–130 <0.001
Pelvic ROM (mean, SD) Range 32.6 (16.7) 2–92 6 (10) 36–75 <0.001
True lumbar ROM (mean, SD) Range 39.1 (12.9) 3–65 53.9 (8.2) 38–70 <0.001

MVF = maximum voluntary flexion, EXT = re-extension, FLEX = flexion

*

Cut-off score used in previous research15,33