Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 11;8(3):e59055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059055

Table 2. Pre-RRT nerve excitability results for HDF and HFHD groups compared to controls.

Normal controls HDF HFHD ANOVA F, p
Recovery Cycle
Refractoriness (%) 19.3(±2.9) 27.0(±7.2) 60.4(±8.4)a,b 15.4, <0.001
Superexcitability (%) −21.7(±1.5) −12.2(±2.3)a −2.0(±2.5)a,b 29.0, <0.001
Threshold Electrotonus
TEh (90–100 ms) (%) −117(±3) −112(±9) −85(±8)a,b 9.7, <0.001
TEd (10–20 ms) (%) 68.4(±1.0) 59.6(±3.6)a 53.1(±2.4)a 17.7, <0.001
TEd (90–100 ms) (%) 45.4(±0.7) 40.6(±2.2)a 36.4(±1.6)a 12.2, <0.001
Current Threshold
Resting I/V slope 0.60(±0.01) 0.67(±0.07) 0.84(±0.07)a,b 8.3, 0.001

All values given as mean (±SEM). By convention threshold electrotonus, refractoriness and superexcitability are expressed as percentage change in threshold. TEd, depolarising threshold electrotonus; TEh, hyperpolarising threshold electrotonus; I/V, current threshold.

a

Significantly different to controls,

b

significantly different to HDF.