Table 1.

Pearson’s r-values for correlations between tapping variability and behavioral measures.

Correlations with tapping variability (r-value)	Paced			Unpaced
	2 Hz	1.5 Hz	Compo	2 Hz	1.5 Hz	Compo
WJIII Word Attack	−0.38	−0.28	−0.38	−0.19	−0.15	−0.20
WJIII Letter-Word ID	−0.35	−0.27	−0.35	−0.00	−0.10	−0.08
WJIII Basic Reading Composite	−0.38	−0.3	−0.39	−0.08	−0.14	−0.15
TOWRE Sight Word Efficiency	−0.20	−0.12	−0.18	0.22	0.00	0.1
TOWRE Phonetic Decoding Efficiency	−0.39	−0.14	−0.27	0.03	0.04	0.02
TOWRETotal Composite	−0.34	−0.15	−0.26	0.12	0.04	0.08
Sustained Auditory Attention	−0.54	−0.35	−0.47	−0.09	−0.31	−0.26
Sustained Visual Attention	−0.49	−0.45	−0.51	−0.25	−0.37	−0.39
Auditory Cued Attention	0.42	0.18	0.30	−0.02	0.24	0.17
Auditory Uncued Attention	0.31	0.09	0.19	−0.08	0.24	0.12
Visual Cued Attention	0.11	0.15	0.13	−0.03	0.18	0.13
Visual Uncued Attention	0.07	0.04	0.08	−0.09	0.24	0.17
Backward masking, no gap	0.44	0.46	0.51	−0.06	0.18	0.07
Backward masking, 50 ms gap	0.42	0.32	0.39	0.08	0.23	0.21
WASI performance IQ	−0.07	0.14	0.06	−0.10	0.04	−0.05
WASI verballQ	−0.02	0.00	−0.02	−0.06	0.04	−0.01
WASI TotallQ	−0.16	−0.17	−0.19	−0.08	−0.02	−0.07

Bolded entries are significant at p < 0.05. All significant relationships were in the direction of less variability in tapping correlating with better behavioral performance.