Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2013 Feb 9;124(3):225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.014

Table 2.

Pearson’s r-values for correlations between reading ability and measures of attention and backward masking thresholds.

Correlations with reading (r-value) WJIIWA WJIII LWID WJIII BR TOWRE S TOWRE P TOWRET
Sustained Auditory Attention 0.28 0.09 0.20 0.31 0.29 0.33
Sustained Visual Attention 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.41 0.27 0.38
Auditory Cued Attention −0.15 −0.05 −0.11 −0.17 −0.17 −0.19
Auditory Uncued Attention −0.26 −0.10 −0.19 −0.23 −0.22 −0.25
Visual Cued Attention −0.00 0.09 0.04 −0.10 0.02 −0.06
Visual Uncued Attention −0.18 0.03 −0.07 −0.20 −0.15 −0.20
Backward masking, no gap −0.43 −0.39 −0.44 −0.32 −0.48 −0.46
Backward masking, 50 ms gap −0.14 −0.11 −0.14 0.06 −0.18 −0.055
WASI performance IQ 0.24 0.45 0.39 0.12 0.15 0.15
WASI verballQ 0.11 0.54 0.38 0.41 0.14 0.32
WASI TotallQ 0.33 0.64 0.53 0.38 0.25 0.37

Bolded entries are significant at p < 0.05. Bolded entries are significant at p < 0.05. All significant relationships were in the direction of less variability in tapping correlating with better behavioral performance.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure