Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 20;168(5):1165–1181. doi: 10.1111/bph.12018

Table 1.

The effect of antioxidants on neutrophil TEM

Inhibitor Drug concentration Inhibition of control [%] n Significance Inhibition of control [%] n Significance
30 min pretreatment 16 h pretreatment
SOD 2000 U·mL−1 −10.8 ± 16.5 3 ns 14.6 ± 2.6 2 ns
Catalase 250 U·mL−1 15.3 ± 10.2 4 ns 32.2 ± 3.4 3 P < 0.05
SOD + Catalase 2000 U·mL−1, 250 U·mL−1 25.7 ± 11.0 4 P < 0.05
MnTBAP 50 μM 43.5 ± 15.3 3 P < 0.05 37.4 ± 5.7 3 P < 0.05
Tob 0.01 mM 19.4 ± 32.6 3 ns 20.3 ± 3.6 5 P < 0.01
Tob 0.1 mM 18.9 ± 8.4 3 ns 12.3 ± 5.2 5 P < 0.05
Tob 0.5 mM −8.8 ± 20.6 3 ns 10.1 ± 2.8 5 ns
CuT 0.01 mM −5.0 ± 13.8 4 ns 3.2 ± 7.9 5 ns
CuT 0.1 mM 11.6 ± 9.3 4 ns 16.3 ± 6.8 5 ns
CuT 0.5 mM 19.1 ± 7.6 4 ns 33.8 ± 10.4 5 P < 0.05

The treatment was compared with neutrophil (2 × 106 cells·mL−1) migration through TNF-α (10 ng mL−1)-stimulated HLMVEC towards thrombin (2 U·mL−1)-activated platelets (1 × 108 cells·mL−1). Inhibitors were added to upper and lower wells for 30 min or 16 h prior to TEM for 3 h. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM for at least three independent experiments. Data were analysed using two-tailed, paired t-test and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparison test, as appropriate.