Table 2.
Study | Aims | Patient characteristics | Imaging techniques & paradigms | Main results | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meinzer et al., 2004 | Localization of excessive slow wave activity in the delta frequency range and impact of changed activity after treatment | 28 chronic patients treated with CI-based aphasia therapy or model-oriented therapy Time since stroke: 13–156 months |
MEG, resting state Correlation of activity change with improvement (standardized language test, AAT Token Test and profile score) after therapy |
Excessive slow wave activity was found mainly in perilesional areas Change in slow wave activity after treatment is correlated with the degree of improvement |
Highlights the importance of perilesional brain areas in language rehabilitation Up- or down regulation of slow wave activity was associated with improvement, pointing to two different mechanisms of brain plasticity |
Pulvermüller et al., 2005 | Processing of language stimuli before and after intervention | 9 patients with chronic aphasia Time since stroke: 16–233 months |
EEG, word and pseudoword evoked electrocortical responses | Early word-evoked response changed after treatment, no change for pseudowords Correlation of treatment gains and brain activity changes in both hemispheres |
Highlights the importance of right and left hemisphere for treatment success |
Meinzer et al., 2008 | Pre-post assessment of functional activity changes in individually determined ROIs based on areas of excessive slow wave activity | 11 patients with chronic aphasia and anomia Time since stroke: 19–66 months |
fMRI, overt picture naming task Correlation of activity changes with naming improvement |
Positive correlation between increased activity in pre-defined slow wave ROIs and naming improvement No correlations in left and right hemisphere control ROIs |
Study emphasizes importance of perilesional areas for language rehabilitation in the chronic stage of aphasia |
Richter et al., 2008 | Impact of right-hemisphere activity on “aphasia recovery potential” Pre-post assessments of activity changes in right hemisphere ROIs in response to treatment |
16 patients with chronic aphasia Time since stroke: All >1 year |
fMRI, reading and wordstem completion tasks Correlation of activity prior to treatment and activity changes after treatment with composite language score |
More pronounced activity in right hemisphere ROIs prior to treatment predicted treatment outcome Decreased activity in right hemisphere ROIs after treatment was associated with improvement |
Downregulation of “dysfunctional” right hemisphere activity may be associated with treatment-induced improvement |
Breier et al., 2009 | To assess specific brain activity changes associated with short- and long-term training success | 23 patients with chronic aphasia Time since stroke: all >1 year |
MEG, word recognition task Three assessment points (prior to and after treatment; 3-months follow-up) Patients were divided in three groups: (1) treatment responders who maintained gains (2) responders who lost gains at follow-up assessment (3) non-responders |
Only group that maintained initial treatment gains showed consistent up-regulation of activity in left hemisphere at both assessments | Highlights the importance of perilesional areas in the left-hemisphere Groups with different treatment outcome show specific changes in brain activity Emphasizes the need for follow-up assessments as activity patterns show dynamic changes depending on treatment success |
fMRI=functional magnetic resonance imaging; EEG=electroencephalography; MEG=magnetoencephalography; ROI=region-of-interest