Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1 Suppl):S35–S45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.040

Table 2.

Overview of functional imaging group studies (N>5 patients)

Study Aims Patient characteristics Imaging techniques & paradigms Main results Conclusions
Meinzer et al., 2004 Localization of excessive slow wave activity in the delta frequency range and impact of changed activity after treatment 28 chronic patients treated with CI-based aphasia therapy or model-oriented therapy
Time since stroke: 13–156 months
MEG, resting state
Correlation of activity change with improvement (standardized language test, AAT Token Test and profile score) after therapy
Excessive slow wave activity was found mainly in perilesional areas
Change in slow wave activity after treatment is correlated with the degree of improvement
Highlights the importance of perilesional brain areas in language rehabilitation
Up- or down regulation of slow wave activity was associated with improvement, pointing to two different mechanisms of brain plasticity
Pulvermüller et al., 2005 Processing of language stimuli before and after intervention 9 patients with chronic aphasia
Time since stroke: 16–233 months
EEG, word and pseudoword evoked electrocortical responses Early word-evoked response changed after treatment, no change for pseudowords
Correlation of treatment gains and brain activity changes in both hemispheres
Highlights the importance of right and left hemisphere for treatment success
Meinzer et al., 2008 Pre-post assessment of functional activity changes in individually determined ROIs based on areas of excessive slow wave activity 11 patients with chronic aphasia and anomia
Time since stroke: 19–66 months
fMRI, overt picture naming task
Correlation of activity changes with naming improvement
Positive correlation between increased activity in pre-defined slow wave ROIs and naming improvement
No correlations in left and right hemisphere control ROIs
Study emphasizes importance of perilesional areas for language rehabilitation in the chronic stage of aphasia
Richter et al., 2008 Impact of right-hemisphere activity on “aphasia recovery potential”
Pre-post assessments of activity changes in right hemisphere ROIs in response to treatment
16 patients with chronic aphasia
Time since stroke: All >1 year
fMRI, reading and wordstem completion tasks
Correlation of activity prior to treatment and activity changes after treatment with composite language score
More pronounced activity in right hemisphere ROIs prior to treatment predicted treatment outcome
Decreased activity in right hemisphere ROIs after treatment was associated with improvement
Downregulation of “dysfunctional” right hemisphere activity may be associated with treatment-induced improvement
Breier et al., 2009 To assess specific brain activity changes associated with short- and long-term training success 23 patients with chronic aphasia
Time since stroke: all >1 year
MEG, word recognition task
Three assessment points (prior to and after treatment; 3-months follow-up)
Patients were divided in three groups: (1) treatment responders who maintained gains (2) responders who lost gains at follow-up assessment (3) non-responders
Only group that maintained initial treatment gains showed consistent up-regulation of activity in left hemisphere at both assessments Highlights the importance of perilesional areas in the left-hemisphere
Groups with different treatment outcome show specific changes in brain activity
Emphasizes the need for follow-up assessments as activity patterns show dynamic changes depending on treatment success

fMRI=functional magnetic resonance imaging; EEG=electroencephalography; MEG=magnetoencephalography; ROI=region-of-interest