Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Feb 1;292(5):R1819–R1827. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00339.2006

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

1.0M sucrose preference in OLETF and LETO rats after food restriction. Non-food deprived OLETF rats showed higher preference for 1.0M sucrose as a percentage of total sucrose intakes than LETO rats when given 1 hr access to both 1.0M and 0.3M sucrose solutions. LETO rats showed increased 1.0M sucrose after high food restriction, while OLETF rats showed in difference in sucrose preference under the same restriction conditions. Low chow restriction did not alter sucrose preference in either strain. Numbers above SEM bars represent mean percent preference between 1.0M and 0.3M sucrose for each strain. (#P<0.05; indicates between strain preference differences within each restriction condition; *P<0.05; indicates within strain preference differences from non-deprived baseline).