Table 3.
Method | tRanka | PLSRankb | RFRankc | SVMRankd | LDARanke |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pearson correlation coefficient matrix based on all variables | |||||
| |||||
(A) Normal versus CRC | |||||
tRank | 1.000 | 0.794f | 0.575 | 0.327 | 0.342 |
PLSRank | 0.794 | 1.000 | 0.574 | 0.328 | 0.342 |
RFRank | 0.575 | 0.574 | 1.000 | 0.210 | 0.256 |
SVMRank | 0.327 | 0.328 | 0.210 | 1.000 | 0.167 |
LDARank | 0.342 | 0.342 | 0.256 | 0.167 | 1.000 |
(B) Pre versus post | |||||
tRank | 1.000 | 0.232 | 0.217 | 0.021 | 0.032 |
PLSRank | 0.232 | 1.000 | 0.652 | 0.066 | 0.066 |
RFRank | 0.217 | 0.652 | 1.000 | 0.086 | 0.057 |
SVMRank | 0.021 | 0.066 | 0.086 | 1.000 | 0.007 |
LDARank | 0.032 | 0.066 | 0.057 | 0.007 | 1.000 |
| |||||
Pearson correlation coefficient matrix based on identified metabolites | |||||
| |||||
(C) Normal versus CRC | |||||
tRank | 1.000 | 0.753 | 0.754 | 0.364 | 0.340 |
PLSRank | 0.753 | 1.000 | 0.756 | 0.267 | 0.340 |
RFRank | 0.754 | 0.756 | 1.000 | 0.495 | 0.308 |
SVMRank | 0.364 | 0.267 | 0.495 | 1.000 | 0.190 |
LDARank | 0.340 | 0.340 | 0.308 | 0.190 | 1.000 |
(D) Pre versus post | |||||
tRank | 1.000 | 0.272 | 0.258 | 0.194 | 0.187 |
PLSRank | 0.272 | 1.000 | 0.733 | 0.048 | 0.044 |
RFRank | 0.258 | 0.733 | 1.000 | 0.034 | 0.041 |
SVMRank | 0.194 | 0.048 | 0.034 | 1.000 | 0.187 |
LDARank | 0.187 | 0.044 | 0.041 | 0.187 | 1.000 |
avariable rank by the P value of t-test.
bvariable rank by the VIP value of PLS.
cvariable rank by the Gini value of RF.
dvariable rank by the SVM-REF.
evariable rank by the LDA coefficient.
fPearson correlation coefficient of PLS and t-test variable rank lists for differentiating Normal and CRC.