Table 2.
Group 1 | Group 2 | p value |
---|---|---|
FII | ||
Line E Wt female | Line E Tg female | p =0.001 |
Line H Wt female | Line H Tg female | p = 0.001 |
FVII | ||
Line E Wt male | Line E Tg male | p = 0.001 |
Line E Wt female | Line E Tg female | p = 0.001 |
Line H Wt male | Line H Tg male | p = 0.001 |
Line H Wt female | Line H Tg female | p = 0.001 |
Line E Wt male | Line E Wt female | p = 0.01 |
Line E Tg male | Line E Tg female | p = 0.05 |
Line H Wt male | Line H Wt female | p = 0.001 |
FX | ||
Line E Wt female | Line E Tg female | p = 0.01 |
Line H Wt male | Line H Tg male | p = 0.05 |
Line H Wt female | Line H Tg female | p = 0.001 |
Line H Wt male | Line H Wt female | p = 0.05 |
Log-transformed data were used to calculate significant differences in antidrug-specific Ig concentrations between the different groups using one-way ANOVA.