Table 3.
Differences between Potential Problem Gamblers and Non-Gamblers on Schema Interpretations.
| Schema | Potential Problem Gamblers (n = 49) (%) | Non-Gamblers (n = 579) (%) | χ2(df), p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional Deprivation | 9.18(1), < .01 | ||
| High | 20.4 | 10.9 | |
| Very High | 18.4 | 9.3 | |
| Abandonment | 6.87(1), < .01 | ||
| High | 10.2 | 9.8 | |
| Very High | 32.7 | 15.7 | |
| Mistrust/Abuse | 4.68(1), < .05 | ||
| High | 14.3 | 11.1 | |
| Very High | 26.5 | 15.4 | |
| Social Isolation | 6.69(1), < .05 | ||
| High | 14.3 | 7.8 | |
| Very High | 18.4 | 9.8 | |
| Defectiveness | 3.52(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 12.2 | 6.6 | |
| Very High | 14.3 | 9.5 | |
| Failure | .730(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 8.2 | 5.9 | |
| Very High | 6.1 | 4.5 | |
| Dependence | 2.64(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 4.1 | 5.4 | |
| Very High | 14.3 | 5.4 | |
| Vulnerability | 3.01(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 2.0 | 10.4 | |
| Very High | 14.3 | 10.2 | |
| Enmeshment | 1.54(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 8.2 | 5.4 | |
| Very High | 8.2 | 5.2 | |
| Entitlement | 2.76(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 16.3 | 12.4 | |
| Very High | 18.4 | 11.6 | |
| Insufficient Self-Control | 12.75(1), < .001 | ||
| High | 24.5 | 15.7 | |
| Very High | 38.8 | 21.6 | |
| Subjugation | 2.19(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 14.3 | 9.2 | |
| Very High | 10.2 | 7.1 | |
| Self-Sacrifice | 7.02(1), < .01 | ||
| High | 16.3 | 17.1 | |
| Very High | 63.3 | 43.4 | |
| Emotional Inhibition | 14.67(1), < .001 | ||
| High | 18.4 | 13.5 | |
| Very High | 32.7 | 12.1 | |
| Unrelenting Standards | 1.27(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 20.4 | 19.5 | |
| Very High | 44.9 | 37.5 | |
| Approval-Seeking | 4.54(1), < .05 | ||
| High | 6.1 | 10.5 | |
| Very High | 32.7 | 14.3 | |
| Negativity/Pessimism | 1.35(1), > .05 | ||
| High | 10.2 | 13.8 | |
| Very High | 30.6 | 18.8 | |
| Punitiveness | 4.97(1), < .05 | ||
| High | 24.5 | 18.8 | |
| Very High | 32.7 | 21.9 |