Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 13;8(3):e59095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059095

Table 1. Relationships between pathological features and HuR expression.

HuR in nucleus (%) HuR in cytoplasm (%)
N Negative Positive Negative Positive
pT stage
Ta 33 12 (36.4) 21 (63.6) 31 (93.9) 2 (6.1)
T1 70 18 (25.7) 52 (74.3) 57 (81.4) 13 (18.6)
T2 11 2 (18.2) 9 (81.8) 2 (18.2) 9 (81.8)
T3 8 2 (18.2) 6 (75.0) 1 (12.5) 7 (87.5)
Low (Ta+1) 103 30 (29.1) 73 (70.9) 88 (85.4) 16 (14.6)
High(T2+3) 19 4 (21.1) 15 (78.9) 3 (15.8) 16 (84.1)
P value 0.471 <0.001
Grade (G)
G1 34 10 (29.4) 24 (70.6) 28 (82.4) 6 (17.6)
G2 43 10 (29.4) 33 (76.4) 38 (88.3) 5 (11.7)
G3 45 14 (31.1) 31 (68.9) 25 (55.6) 20 (44.4)
Low (G1+2) 77 20 (25.9) 57 (74.1) 66 (85.7) 11 (14.3)
High (G3) 45 14 (31.1) 31 (68.9) 25 (55.6) 20 (44.4)
P value 0.773 <0.001
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure