Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 13;8(3):e58028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058028

Table 1. Comparison of transcriptome profiles used in the study.

Transcriptome profiling Notation Cluster
Rm1021-glu1 vs. Rm1021-NH4 2 1021-Glu vs. 1021-NH4 Cluster I and II
Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH4 D-Glu vs. D- NH4 Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH4 BK-Glu vs. BK-NH4 Cluster III
Rm1021-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu 1021-Glu vs. D-Glu Cluster III
Rm1021-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu 1021-Glu vs. BK-Glu Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu BK-Glu vs. D-Glu Cluster III
Rm1021-NH4 vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH4 1021-NH4 vs. D-NH4 Cluster III
Rm1021-NH4 vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH4 1021-NH4 vs. BK-NH4 Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH4 vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH4 BK-NH4 vs. D-NH4 Cluster III

The cells were grown in MM media supplemented with: 1–0.02% sodium glutamate as nitrogen source and 2–0.05% ammonium chloride as nitrogen source.