. 2013 Mar 13;8(3):e58028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058028

Table 1. Comparison of transcriptome profiles used in the study.

Transcriptome profiling	Notation	Cluster
Rm1021-glu¹ vs. Rm1021-NH₄ ²	1021-Glu vs. 1021-NH₄	Cluster I and II
Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH₄	D-Glu vs. D- NH₄	Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH₄	BK-Glu vs. BK-NH₄	Cluster III
Rm1021-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu	1021-Glu vs. D-Glu	Cluster III
Rm1021-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu	1021-Glu vs. BK-Glu	Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-glu vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-glu	BK-Glu vs. D-Glu	Cluster III
Rm1021-NH₄ vs. Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH₄	1021-NH₄ vs. D-NH₄	Cluster III
Rm1021-NH₄ vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH₄	1021-NH₄ vs. BK-NH₄	Cluster III
Rm1021ΔglnD-sm2-NH₄ vs. Rm1021ΔglnBΔglnK-NH₄	BK-NH₄ vs. D-NH₄	Cluster III

The cells were grown in MM media supplemented with: 1–0.02% sodium glutamate as nitrogen source and 2–0.05% ammonium chloride as nitrogen source.