Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Aug;48(4):922–943. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/064)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Actual (filled circles) versus predicted (open circles) performance (based on multiple looks) grouped by number of comparison stimulus repetitions. The top panel shows performance for /pa/ versus /ta/ at −6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the middle panel shows that for /ra/ versus /la/ at −6 dB SNR, and the bottom panel shows performance for /sa/ versus /ʃa/ at −8 dB SNR. The numerical values indicate the ratio of predicted to actual performance at each stimulus repetition condition in which predictions were made.