Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Nov 22;41(4):806–813. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0705-2

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Exemplary reconstructed attractors for ankle motion of an amputee and healthy control. The prosthetic ankle motion (A) has greater attractor divergence than the sound ankle (B) and a healthy non-amputee ankle (C). Notice, however, the Lyapunov exponent quantifies attractor divergence but is not largely affected by the overall shape of the attractor.