Table 3.

Hazard models of the effect of baseline predictors on sexual dating aggression onset

	Bivariate Model		Multivariate Model
Variable	Hazard Ratio	95% CI	Hazard Ratio	95% CI
Propensity variables
Hit by adult	1.28	0.91–1.82	1.01	0.63–1.60
Witnessed domestic violence	1.45^	0.98−2.13	1.30	0.80−2.12
Forced sex	1.48	0.43−5.10	0.62	0.16−2.36
Peer aggression (PA)	1.77**	1.22−2.59	1.25	0.73−2.12
Rape myth acceptance (RMA)	1.86**	1.23−2.83	1.28	0.76−2.18
Control tactics	1.93*	1.01−3.74	1.20	0.58−2.51
Physical dating aggression (DA)	5.05***	2.55−10.07	2.89*	1.09−7.69
Constraint variables
Social bonding	0.78*	0.61−0.99	0.90	0.64−1.28
Parental monitoring knowledge	0.89	0.65−1.20	1.04	0.73−1.51
Interactions
RMA × DA	--	--	4.14*	1.01−16.78
RMA × PA	--	--	1.92*	1.05−3.53

Note:

^{^}p<.10;

^*p<.05;

^**p<.01;

^***p<.001.

All parameter estimates are adjusted for grade, grade-squared, age, cohort, minority status, family structure, parent education, baseline number of dating partners and dating exposure.