Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2012 Jun;12(12):2024–2035. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100666

Table 1.

Summary of 2D DIGE analysis of liver extracts. Protein extracts were prepared from the livers of LPS-treated wild-type (WT) and GSNOR −/− knockout (KO) mice

Fluorescent dye No. of spots Genotype/group
1 Cy3 4111 WT-1
Cy5 4111 KO-1
Cy2 4111 Standard
2 Cy3 4513 WT-2
Cy5 4513 KO-2
Cy2 4513 Standard
3 Cy3 3920 WT-3
Cy5 3920 KO-3
Cy2 3920 Standard
4 Cy3 4264 KO-1
Cy5 4264 WT-2
Cy2 4264 Standard
5 Cy3 3979 KO-2
Cy5 3979 WT-3
Cy2 3979 Standard
6 Cy3 4019 KO-3
Cy5 4019 WT-1
Cy2 4019 Standard
7 Cy3 4047 WT-1
Cy5 4047 KO-2
Cy2 4047 Standard
8 Cy3 3874 WT-2
Cy5 3874 KO-3
Cy2 3874 Standard
9 Cy3 4378 WT-3
Cy5 4378 KO-1
Cy2 4378 Standard

Internal standard (Standard) sample was prepared by pooling equal amounts of proteins from each extract. As shown, samples were labeled with the indicated fluorescent dyes and subjected to 2D DIGE as described in Section 2. This table also includes information on the number of protein spots detected on each 2D DIGE gel and genotype/group of the sample used for the 2D DIGE analysis.