Table 1. Correlations among predictors and outcome variables (N = 356).
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Braziliana | – | −0.47** | −0.49** | −0.08 | −0.00 | 0.02 | 0.08 | −0.05 | −0.08 | 0.04 |
2. Colombiana | – | −0.54** | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.06 | −0.01 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |
3. Dominicana | – | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.05 | −0.01 | −0.06 | ||
4. Latino beliefs Partner variables | – | −0.02 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | −0.07 | −0.06 | |||
5. Main partner | – | 0.36** | 0.09 | −0.16* | −0.23** | −0.24** | ||||
6. Seroconcordance Physical variables | – | 0.07 | −0.22** | −0.08 | −0.16* | |||||
7. Sexual desire | – | 0.06 | −0.17* | −0.07 | ||||||
8. Intoxication Outcomes | – | −0.08 | −0.08 | |||||||
9. Condom communication | – | 0.45** | ||||||||
10. Condom use | – | |||||||||
Mean | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 3.10 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 3.05 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.75 |
Min | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Max | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Dummy coding was applied to the country of birth to create dichotomous variables [Brazilian (1) vs. not (0) and Colombian (1) vs. not (0); Dominicans served as the reference group]
P<0.01,
P<0.0001