Table 2. Logistic set regression: communication about condom use (N = 356).
Model | −2 log L | Overall model | Δ −2 log L | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Set 1: cultural set | 477.77 | X2(3) = 5.59 | ||
Set 2: partner set | 459.17 | X2(5) = 24.19* | 18.60** | |
Set 3: physical set | 447.76 | X2(7) = 35.60** | 11.41* | |
| ||||
Final model | Coefficient | Wald X2 | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| ||||
Set 1: cultural set | ||||
Brazilian | −0.29 | 1.04 | 0.75 | 0.43–1.30 |
Colombian | 0.22 | 0.63 | 1.24 | 0.73–2.13 |
Latino beliefs inventory | −0.25 | 1.87 | 0.78 | 0.54–1.12 |
Set 2: partner set | ||||
Main partner | −1.05 | 16.36** | 0.35 | 0.21–0.58 |
Seroconcordance | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.96 | 0.58–1.58 |
Set 3: physical set | ||||
Sexual desire | −0.36 | 6.36* | 0.70 | 0.53–0.92 |
Intoxication | −0.51 | 4.00* | 0.60 | 0.36–0.99 |
P <0.05,
P <0.0001