Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr;15(3):613–620. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9760-6

Table 3. Logistic set regression: condom use at most recent anal intercourse (N = 356).

Model −2 log L Overall model Δ −2 log L
Set 1: cultural set 399.84 X2(3) = 2.72
Set 2: partner set 377.92 X2(5) = 24.64* 21.92**
Set 3: physical set 370.83 X2(7) = 31.74** 7.09*
Set 4: condom communication 309.30 X2(8) = 93.27** 61.53**

Final model Coefficient Wald X2 Odds ratio 95% CI

Set 1: cultural set
Brazilian 0.53 2.21 1.70 0.85–3.41
Colombian 0.09 0.08 1.10 0.57–2.13
Latino beliefs inventory −0.17 0.52 0.85 0.53–1.34
Set 2: partner set
Main partner −0.70 4.88* 0.49 0.27–0.92
Seroconcordance −0.68 4.35* 0.51 0.27–0.96
Set 3: physical set
Sexual desire 0.03 0.04 1.03 0.73–1.46
Intoxication −0.65 4.07* 0.52 0.28–0.98
Set 4: condom communication 2.23 50.83** 9.31 5.04–17.19
*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.0001