Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2012 Dec 20;12(1):187–198. doi: 10.1021/pr301054n

Figure 7. Relative quantification of two swine Tm isoforms (α–Tm and β–Tm) and their phosphorylation forms (pα–Tm and pβ–Tm) from three different swine hearts (A), (B) and (C), respectively. (D) Summary plot of Tm isoforms and their phosphorylated forms from a total of three biological replicates.

Figure 7

The percentage of α–Tm, pα–Tm, β–Tm and pβ–Tm was defined as summed abundances of α–Tm, pα–Tm, β–Tm and pβ–Tm over the summed abundances of the entire Tm populations, respectively. The bar graphic data were expressed with means ± S.D. Samples are run in triplicate.