Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 15;121(11):2051–2058. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-454355

Table 1.

Comparison of MYD88 L265P before and after treatment using real-time AS-PCR in patients with WM

Patient Age (years) Gender Treatment Pre-/posttherapy BM involved, % Pre-/posttherapy MYD88 L265P levels Change in BM involved, % Change in MYD88 L265P levels, %
A 61 Male Benda-R 70 (negative) 78.45 (negative) −100 −100
B 44 Male R-CD 90 60.73 −89 −96.33
10 2.23
C 52 Male R-CD 50 72.12 −90 −73.61
5 19.03
D 59 Male Everolimus 95 99.15 −47 −45.39
50 54.15
E 63 Male Everolimus 90 96.07 −67 −21.03
30 75.87
F 70 Male Everolimus 95 95.93 −37 −8.61
60 87.67
G 63 Male Everolimus 20 67.93 25 12.87
25 76.67

Changes in expression levels for MYD88 L265P were calculated from a standard curve.

Benda-R, bendamustine and rituximab; R-CD, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone.