Table 2.
Identification method | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Single PCRa | Provides a more accurate, sensitive and rapid detection of single bacteria or genes | Does not produce isolates that can further be characterized, components in foods can interfere with PCR performance and give misleading results, PCR conditions must be optimized for better performance | Sails et al. (1998); Wang et al. (2000); Abulreesh et al. (2006) |
Multiplex PCRa | Reduces cost, limits sample volumes and allows rapid detection of multiple bacteria | Primer design is critical, primers may interfere with each other leaving some genes and bacteria undetected | Elnifro et al. 2000; Shi et al. (2010) |
Real-time PCRb | Shortens detection time, detect and quantify bacteria in real time, and high sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility | Require expensive equipment and reagents, setting up requires high technical skills | Heid et al. (1996); Wong and Medrano (2005); Shi et al. (2010) |
Reverse-transcription PCRb | Can detect only viable cells of pathogens | Much skill is required to handle unstable RNA for pathogen detection | Sails et al. (1998); Sharma (2006); Shi et al. (2010) |
Nested PCRb | Has improved sensitivity and specificity than the conventional PCR method | Contamination level can be high probably from the laboratory environment | Picken et al. (1997) |
aApplied to duck bacterial isolates
bTheir applications to duck bacterial isolates are unavailable or yet to be published