Table 2.
Model 1 | Model 2 | |
---|---|---|
Intercept | −290*** (.021) | −290*** (.021) |
Baseline cognitive function | −.170*** (.016) | −.171*** (.016) |
APOE-E4 genotype | −.123*** (.024) | −.125*** (.023) |
Neighborhood disorder | −.415*** (.106) | −.468*** (.107) |
Neighborhood disadvantage | −.004 (.019) | −.004 (.019) |
Respondent race [Black = 1] | .040 (.031) | .038 (.031) |
Respondent education (std.) | .019* (.009) | .018* (.009) |
Respondent age (std.) | −.256*** (.011) | −.257*** (.011) |
Respondent sex [Male= 1] | .004 (.016) | .005 (.016) |
Duration of residence | .051*** (.009) | .050*** (.009) |
Follow-up time | −.057*** (.009) | −.057*** (.009) |
APOE-E4 * Disorder | .371** (.139) | |
| ||
SD (slope) | .071 | .066 |
−2LL | 5934.774 | 5933.274 |
Likelihood ratio | 8.542 | 1.500 |
df | 1 | 1 |
p < | .003 | .220 |
Note: all data have been weighted to correct for sampling design of the Chicago Health and Aging Project. The full sample models include a random effect for APOE-E4 genotype at the neighborhood-level. The likelihood ratios compare the -2LogLikelihood estimates of the current model to the prior baseline model. Corresponding degrees of freedom and probability of overall model improvement are provided.
p <.001,
p <.01,
p <.05.