Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 12;172(20):1601–1603. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3726

Table.

Use of Prostate Specific Antigen–Based Prostate Cancer Screeninga

Men Aged 66–74 y
Men Aged ≥75 y
Difference in Differences, Percentage Point Change (95% CI)b
Before, % (Apr 2007– June 2008) After, % (Oct 2008– Dec 2009) Before-After Percentage Point Difference Before, % (Apr 2007– June 2008) After, % (Oct 2008– Dec 2009) Before-After Percentage Point Difference
Overall 33.9 34.4 0.5 29.4 27.8 −1.6 −2.0 (−3.1 to −1.0)

Pre–USPSTF Recommendation Prostate Cancer Screening Rate Among Men Aged75 y in HRR of Residence
Highest quartile 37.4 37.0 −0.4 35.4 32.4 −3.0 −2.7 (−4.8 to −0.5)
Middle quartiles 33.6 33.8 0.2 29.0 27.5 −1.5 −1.6 (−3.0 to −0.1)
Lowest quartile 31.1 32.9 1.8 24.4 24.1 −0.3 −2.0 (−4.0 to −0.1)

Urologist Density in HRR of Residence
Highest quartile 35.1 35.5 0.4 30.6 28.3 −2.3 −2.7 (−4.7 to −0.6)
Middle quartiles 34.4 34.2 −0.2 29.9 28.6 −1.3 −1.0 (−2.5 to 0.5)
Lowest quartile 31.7 33.5 1.8 27.2 25.7 −1.5 −3.3 (−5.3 to −1.3)

Abbreviations: HRR, hospital referral region; USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force.

a

The Table presents use of prostate specific antigen–based screening among cancer-free men aged 66 to 74 years and 75 years and older residing in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program areas before and after the August 2008 USPSTF recommendation to discontinue prostate cancer screening among men 75 years and older and gives the differential changes in these outcomes, stratified by HRR-level prerecommendation screening rates and urologist density. The prerecommendation period was April 2007 to June 2008; the postrecommendation period was October 2008 to December 2009.

b

The difference-in-differences estimates were adjusted for patient race and Elixhauser comorbidity score.