Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 4;29(3):875–884. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2227

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of ɛ-dA prevalence in liver tissues. (A) ɛ-dA prevalence in T was greater than in NT, and it was greater in NT compared to C. (B) The ɛ-dA prevalence in group II (moderately-poorly and poorly differentiated) HCC was greater than in group I (well, well-moderately and moderately differentiated) HCC. (C) Based on necroinflammatory activity, the positive rate of ɛ-dA in group II (moderate and severe chronic hepatitis) was higher than in group I (minimal and mild chronic hepatitis) NT. (D) Based on fibrosis degree, the positive rate of ɛ-dA in group II (severe fibrosis and cirrhosis) was higher than in group I (none and mild and moderate fibrosis) NT. C, control liver tissue; NT, non-tumor liver tissue; T, HCC tissue. Black line represents median.