Table 2.
Revision of HCT policy | Medical male circumcision new policy development | |
---|---|---|
Duration of policy development and implementation process |
2 years (planned duration to completion was 8 months) |
1 year (planned duration was 6 months) |
Presence of guidelines |
No specific guidelines followed |
No specific guidelines followed |
Technical working team (15) |
Leader: DG, MoH; technical staff, implementing partners, development agencies, academicians, and CSO |
SMC National Task Force (NTF) for HIV prevention included senior MoH technical staff members, development partners, implementing partners and CSO |
Technical team selection |
Based on previous experience in policy development engagement, experience in HCT implementation |
Appointed by the Director General MoH Team included experienced persons in HIV response |
Technical working group meeting |
Several held to produce draft 0 |
Consultant hired right from the beginning to produce draft 0 |
Consultative meetings |
Held to develop drafts 1 and 2 |
Held to produce draft 2 |
-Stakeholders meeting produced draft 3 | ||
Peer review by technical team |
Develop draft 3 |
NTF reviewed draft 0 to produce draft 3 |
Senior management committee review |
Develop draft 4 |
NTF forwarded final report tosenior management that developed draft 4 |
Director general of Health Services |
Endorsed draft 4 |
Endorsed draft 4 |
Launching |
Launched by MoH before public use |
|
Challenges |
Limited indigenous funding for policy development activities |
Limited policy development activities |
Busy TWG members |
DG: Director General of Health Services; TWG: Technical Working Group; CSO: Civil Society Organizations.