Table 3.
Convergence and divergence in referral procedures for Site Bravo
| Redundant concept | Convergence or divergence | Supporting data |
|---|---|---|
| PC/MHI has improved access |
Convergence |
MHL: Co-location and the size of the clinic promote positive interactions, as providers see each other at lunch and at meetings. |
| |
Convergence |
MHL: PC/MHI goal is immediate access; PCMH is always available. |
| Convergence |
PCMH: Conducting a pilot study to provide access to walk-in patients. |
|
| Divergence |
PCMH: Getting buy-in from PC is biggest challenge; informal discussions in the lunch room and “selling ourselves” increased curbside consults. |
|
| Divergence |
PCP: Psychiatrists resisted helping PC manage behavioral aspects of chronic diseases, but negotiations have resulted in progress. |
|
| Referrals include standard referrals and curbside consults | Divergence |
PCMH: Nurse routine screening often initiates referrals and some nurses refer patients inappropriately; working with nurse manager to educate staff. |
| Convergence | PCP: Norms indicate that knocking on doors is appropriate, even if it interrupts ongoing psychological care. |
Note: Supporting data are presented as either convergent or divergent with the redundant concept. MHL refers to the mental health leader at the site; PCMH refers to the Primary Care/Mental Health Integration (PC/MHI) informants at the site; PCP refers to the primary care physician informants at the site.